Environment (C300) IRS Verified DX Registered 990 on File

ALABAMAS MTNS RIVERS AND VALLEYS RSC CONSERVATION AND DEV COUNCIL

EIN: 63-0822867 · HARTSELLE, AL 35640-8413 · United States · FY 2025 Data

3 out of 5 55 / 100 Based on 2+ years of filings

Financial strength (30%) 83/100

Reliability (20%) 55/100

Effectiveness (25%) 78/100

Impact (25%) No data yet

Financial data: FY 2025 · Scored 10/18/2026

Donate Claim this Charity

CharityAI™ Score

Not yet evaluated

Mission Statement

To improve the quality of life of the rural residents in its area by the reasonable and responsible protection and development of the natural and human resources of the Tennessee Valley Area. To carry out activities that accelerate the development, conservation and wise use of human, financial and natural resources in order to improve the standard of living within the area.

Financial Overview — FY 2025

$2.1M

Total Revenue

$1.8M

Total Expenses

$1.2M

Net Assets

Employees

Revenue Sources

Expense Breakdown

Program Expense Ratio 92.4%

Fundraising Efficiency N/A

Operating Reserve 8.32x

Liability-to-Asset 2.7%

Revenue Diversification 97.8%

Executive Compensation $204K

Compared with Peers

FY 2025

Compared with 771 similar organizations (United States, Environment, $1M–$10M in expenses), FY 2025.

This organization Middle half of peers (P25–P75) Peer median

Ratio	This org	Peer median	Position (P10 → P90)
Program expense ratio Program expenses / total expenses · higher is better	92.4%	80.9%	P10P90	Top quarter
Admin expense ratio Management and general / total expenses · lower is better	7.4%	12.5%	P10P90	Top quarter
Fundraising expense ratio Fundraising expenses / total expenses · lower is better	0.2%	4.3%	P10P90	Above median
Operating reserve Months of expenses covered by net assets · higher is better	8.3 mo	15.9 mo	P10P90	Below median
Liabilities to assets Total liabilities / total assets · lower is better	2.7%	6.8%	P10P90	Above median
Revenue concentration Share of revenue from the largest source · lower is better	97.8%	87.9%	P10P90	Bottom quarter
Revenue growth Year over year revenue growth	26.2%	12.1%	P10P90
Expense growth Year over year expense growth	8.1%	9.1%	P10P90
Surplus margin Surplus as a share of revenue	16.4%	6.1%	P10P90

Financial History

Year	Revenue	Expenses	Net Assets	Program %	Staff
2025	$2.1M	$1.8M	$1.2M	92.4%	4
2024	$1.7M	$1.7M	$890K	97.5%	6
2023	$1.6M	$1.6M	$894K	97.4%	5
2022	$924K	$922K	$860K	95.7%	4

Donor Reviews

Write a Review

No reviews yet

Be the first to share your experience with this organization.

Write a Review

Your Name *

Email * (private, not shown)

Relationship to Organization *

Your Rating *

Review Title

Your Review *

Minimum 20 characters

Post anonymously

Reviews appear after moderation (usually within 24 hours)

Organization Details

EIN: 63-0822867
State: AL
City: HARTSELLE
ZIP: 35640-8413
Classification: C300
Category: Environment
Rating: 3★
Coverage: A
Last Updated: Aug 2026
IRS Ruling Year
Foundation Code: 15
Form 990: On File

Is this your organization?

Claim it to manage this profile, add your board, financials and impact metrics, and lift your CharityAI™ rating.

Claim this Charity

Write a Review

Back to Search New Search

CharityAI™ rates charities from 0 to 100 using public filings (IRS Form 990 and the equivalent registries outside the US) together with the information the charity itself provides on DonationX. Ratings are recalculated every quarter, without human bias, and shown as stars.

Four pillars

Financial strength30%

Program expense ratio, fundraising efficiency, operating reserves, liabilities and revenue diversification, compared with similar organizations.

Reliability20%

Standing with the registry, filing history, verification and how complete the profile is.

Effectiveness25%

How much goes to programs and how consistently the organization delivers them.

Impact25%

The outcomes the charity reports on DonationX: people served, cost per service and results.

Stars

★★★★★ 80–100 ★★★★☆ 60–79 ★★★☆☆ 40–59 ★★☆☆☆ 20–39 ★☆☆☆☆ 1–19

A pillar with no data counts as zero. Without impact metrics the score is capped at 59 (three stars): only the charity can supply that data.
The coverage grade (A to D) says how much filing data the score rests on; NONE means there is not enough to rate.
An organization that is not in good standing with its registry (for example a revoked tax exemption) is shown as Not rated.
"Compared with peers" places the charity's key ratios against organizations of the same country, sector and size.

How a charity improves its rating

Claim the charity with a work email, a website token, or a document.
Complete the profile: mission, website, logo and contacts.
Add board members, your latest Form 990 or financials, and impact metrics.
Keep it current: the next quarterly rating picks the changes up.